Article 44 of the Constitution of India says: ‘The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India.’This was made clear by the makers of the Constitution of India more than 7 decades ago, yet it is still not fulfilled and is being debated at various fora about its utility and applicability. Thus, it is long overdue and should have been implemented in the early fifties. Then there would not have been any need to introduce the Hindu Code Bill. In fact, no nation can become strong and cohesive if it contains different laws and rules for different communities or persons living in the country. Our Constitution speaks of equality and non-discrimination on the ground of caste, creed or sex yet when we find that the discrimination continues in many ways and sometimes it is used as a tool by some people for their ulterior goals. The most unfortunate part of it is that while equality is demanded but the Uniform Civil Code is opposed on the ground of personal religious freedom. Its opposition is neither in the interest of the country nor of the people. Thus, it will be in the interest of the country and all citizens that the Uniform Civil Code should be made applicable across the country without wasting further time.
Why at all the common civil code ?
A question is often posed why should there be Uniform Civil Code? As it is stated in the outset the common civil code under its umbrella will bring about cohesiveness to different sections of society and will ease the problem of law and order. Unity in diversity is the characteristic of India but diversity does not mean different rules, regulations and laws for different communities. For example- the law of marriage and divorce should be the same but how the marriage is solemnised in different parts of the country is nobody’s business because that does not create any problem for the State and the same can be maintained as a unique feature.
A Uniform Civil Code means that there has to be uniformity in marriage, divorce, guardianship acts and in matters of inheritance. At present, we find that while the women of all religions enjoy complete freedom the women community of the Muslim community are highly discriminated against their male counterparts. It is as clear as daylight that when the Uniform Civil Code is made applicable across the country there will be no need for the Hindu Code Bill, Hindu Marriage Act, Christian Marriage Act or even the Special Marriage Act etc. Once marriage is solemnised each individual will have the liberty to enjoy uniformity; while at present a Hindu, Jain, Buddhist, Persian, or Christian man or woman do have to follow the rules of the marriage and a man or a woman cannot divorce his or her spouse at his or her sweet will without any solid rhymes or reasons as specified in the Act but, on the other hand. Muslim women are placed in a highly disadvantageous position as compared to Muslim men. Muslim women cannot even think of divorcing a man as per Sharia law, the most they can think of is ‘Khula’ i.e., separation, which is well-nigh impossible in the society they live in. However, this freedom is available to Muslim males, which is mostly misused by them. Although Talaq- e – Biddat i.e., pronouncing talaq three times in one go has been prohibited by the Supreme Court of India. It says that Talaq- e- Biddat is illegal yet the pronouncement of talaq by stating it three times in three months is still holding the ground. This will certainly go away once Uniform Civil Code is adopted and it will render massive relief to Muslim women.
Age of Marriage
Men and women in all communities get to grow up at certain age, then there is no point to have different age groups for marriage in different communities. For example, while Hindu, Jain, Buddhist, Christian and Persian males can marry only after attaining the age of 21 years and women can marry only after the age of 18 years, Muslim men do not have any such age bar. It is ridiculous to allow women to marry immediately after attaining the age of puberty which can be between 10 years to 12 or 13 years. This is highly discriminatory against Muslim women which needs to be done away with.
Likewise, it hardly needs to be said that monogamy should be strictly adhered to by all communities. Presently, while all other communities have to follow monogamy, Any violation of it invites the wrath of Section 494 of the IPC, which says: ‘Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife.—Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine’. What is most shocking, is that Muslim women have to bear the brunt of living with four women, if and when their male counterpart decides so. There is no merit in the logic that only a minuscule minority of Muslim men go into polygamy. But why such absurd and laughable liberty should be given to any section of society?
Guardianship and Adoption:
Discrimination is visible among Muslims and other communities. While women of all communities enjoy the privilege of adopting a child, it is denied to the women of the Muslim community. The guardianship right is also discriminatory, and it violates fundamental rights. And therefore, must be done away with. Such anomalies are found in the case of inheritance and distribution of property and maintenance. Such discriminations make a mockery of the laws of the country.
Therefore, Uniform Civil Code should be enacted without any further waiting, and it should be rigorously followed. There should be no objection from any side, particularly when there’s no objection to Uniform Criminal Code, which is welcomed with open arms even by Muslims, who do not want Sharia to be imposed.
Uniform Civil Code a Welcome Move
feel free to email us [email protected]
-
Working Journalist Act must be Amended to Instil Trust in the Profession
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Some people, who have neither any understanding of media nor its constitutional position, have been making thoughtless and stupid...
-
Purposeless agitation of Disguising farmers
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
The ongoing agitation of some farmers of Punjab from November 26 in Delhi is being presented by a section...
-
S.C. Puts Rafale Controversy to Rest
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Parmanand Pandey Rafale Fighter Jets deal case, decided by the Supreme Court, on 14th December, the last working day...
-
Transgenders’ Are ‘Third Gender’ And Have The Right To Live With Dignity
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
By Parmanand Pandey Advocate Transgenders or Hijras or Eunuchs have generally been discriminated ridiculed, humiliated and insulted and jeered...
-
Life in the Time of Corona and After
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Today one young man, who was standing ahead of me at the ‘Safal’, which is the retail network of...
-
Nascent Virtual Courts must Evolve to Maturity
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Virtual Courts and E filings of the cases have, without doubt, come to stay even after the COVID-19. As...
-
Government’s Ambivalent Population Policy is Disappointing
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
The affidavit filed by the Union Government in the Supreme- Court in response to a petition filed by an...
-
Irrelevant controversy about the Degree of Prime Minister
Parmanand Pandey, , Miscellaneous, 0
Is it not amazing that a Chief Minister has got himself embroiled in the controversy over the educational qualifications...
Categories
Recent Posts
- Introduction of e-filing in Allahabad High Court is a Welcome Decision
- Introduction of e-filing in Allahabad High Court is a Welcome Decision
- The conduct of Kejriwal and AAP Leaders is Repulsive and Lowest of the Low
- Comical Behaviour of Arvind Kejriwal
- Karpoori Thakur Fired with Casteism than Idealism. His Personal Honesty was Above the Board
Recent Comments
- נערות ליווי on Arun Shouri’s Latest Tome is Worthless Through and Through
- Jeromeuters on Padma Vibhushan to late Radhey Shyam Khemka: A Well-Deserved Tribute to a Saintly Editor
- Robertweple2145 on Digitalisation of Currency will Revolutionise the Money Circulation
- Victornem45678 on Live-Streaming is the Best Substitute To Open Court Hearing
- Isacwaync on Kudos to ‘Voice of Lucknow’ and its Editor for Protecting the jobs and Salaries of Journalists
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- May 2016
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- July 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- July 2012
- June 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- June 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- October 2009
- September 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- December 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008